Apple ASE-600

Apple ASE-600

Apple
23 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics
100 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Travel
Apple
20
Technics
100
Calls
Apple
21
Technics
100
Music
Apple
19
Technics
94
Budget
Apple
30
Technics
93
Commute
Apple
18
Technics
92
Gaming
Apple
21
Technics
90
Fitness
Apple
21
Technics
85

Spezifikationen

Apple ASE-600Technics EAH-AZ100
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesstrue wireless
Ear Tips5 x Eartip Pairs
Weight0.18 kg0.01 kg
Audio
Driver TypedynamicDynamic
Driver Size10 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max40 kHz
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAZLA ASE-600 ASMR Wired Earbuds with Microphone – Soft Silicone Earphones for School, Comfortable in-Ear Headphones, USB-C Wired Earbuds for Long Listening - Apple iPhone 16 Headphones (Silver)AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC
SurroundDolby Atmos
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typeadaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.3
ProfilesAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorBluetooth
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs
Charge Time2.5 hrs
Fast Charging15 min. for 90 min. playback
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery28 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count6
NC Mic
Features
Touch Controls
AppAndroid & iOS
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX4

Vor- & Nachteile

Apple ASE-600

  • Strong comfort (71th percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average social proof (25th percentile)
  • Below average sound (27th percentile)
  • Below average anc (29th percentile)

Technics EAH-AZ100

  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Technics EAH-AZ100

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 19 of 37 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100 Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness