Fhumsh i17

Fhumsh i17

Fhumsh
41 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics
100 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Calls
Fhumsh
37
Technics
100
Travel
Fhumsh
39
Technics
100
Music
Fhumsh
26
Technics
94
Budget
Fhumsh
44
Technics
94
Commute
Fhumsh
39
Technics
92
Gaming
Fhumsh
35
Technics
90
Fitness
Fhumsh
22
Technics
85

Spezifikationen

Fhumsh i17Technics EAH-AZ100
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear TipsS, M, L5 x Eartip Pairs
Weight0.01 kg
Audio
Driver TypeDynamic
Driver Size10 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max40 kHz
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsWireless Earbuds, Bluetooth 5.4 HiFi Stereo HeadphonesAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC
SurroundDolby Atmos
Noise Control
ANC
ANC TypeEnvironmental Noise Cancellationadaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.45.3
ProfilesAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorBluetooth
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7.5 hrs8 hrs
Charge Time2.5 hrs
Fast ChargingType-C fast charging15 min. for 90 min. playback
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery50 hrs28 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count6
NC Mic
Features
Voice Assistantactivate voice assistants
Touch Controls
AppAndroid & iOS
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX7IPX4

Vor- & Nachteile

Fhumsh i17

  • Strong battery (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong anc (79th percentile)
  • Strong connectivity (71th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (66th percentile)
  • Below average sound (27th percentile)
  • Below average comfort (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Technics EAH-AZ100

  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Technics EAH-AZ100

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 38 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100 Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness