JVC Gumy HAF160B

JVC Gumy HAF160B

JVC
24 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100-K

Technics EAH-AZ100-K

Technics
100 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Travel
JVC
18
Technics
94
Budget
JVC
34
Technics
93
Calls
JVC
10
Technics
92
Music
JVC
28
Technics
90
Commute
JVC
17
Technics
89
Gaming
JVC
16
Technics
87
Fitness
JVC
14
Technics
80

Spezifikationen

JVC Gumy HAF160BTechnics EAH-AZ100-K
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styleear-tiptrue wireless
Ear Tips5 x Eartip Pairs
Weight0.05 kg
Audio
Driver Typeneodymiumdynamic
Driver Size13.5 mm10 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min15 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz40 kHz
Impedance16 Ω
Sensitivity108 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsJVC HA-F160-B-K Earbud Gumy Headphone, BlackAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC
SurroundDolby Atmos
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typeadaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.3
ProfilesAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorBluetooth
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs
Charge Time2.5 hrs
Fast Charging15 min. for 90 min. playback
ChargingproprietaryUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery28 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count6
NC Mic
Features
Touch Controls
AppAndroid & iOS
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX4

Vor- & Nachteile

JVC Gumy HAF160B

  • Strong sound (76th percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average social proof (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average comfort (30th percentile)

Technics EAH-AZ100-K

  • Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile

Preise

JVC Gumy HAF160B

Technics EAH-AZ100-K

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gewinner: Technics EAH-AZ100-K

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 20 of 39 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100-K Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Auch in Betracht ziehen