Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
Apple
96 Gesamtbewertung
vs
XIAOWTEK S66
XIAOWTEK
52 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Commute
Travel
Fitness
Calls
Gaming
Music
Spezifikationen
| Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A | XIAOWTEK S66 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | — |
| Ear Tips | XXS, XS, S, M, L | — |
| Weight | 0.01 kg★ | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | Dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 13.399999618530273 mm★ |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, SBC | Wireless Earbuds, Bluetooth 5.4 Headphones with 50H Playback, Deep Bass Stereo Ear Buds Clear Calls with LED Power Display, IPX7 Waterproof, in-Ear Earphones with Mic for Phone/Android/iPad, Purple |
| Surround | Spatial Audio | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | Adaptive Audio | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4★ |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Fast Charging | 5 minutes in the case provides around 1 hour of listening time | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 24 hrs | 50 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2 | 2 |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Android & iOS | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IP57 | IPX7 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
XIAOWTEK S66
- Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong battery (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong mic (79th percentile)
- Strong user sentiment (79th percentile)
- Below average comfort (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Fazit
Gewinner: Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 8 of 30 specs.