Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
Apple
93 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Timekettle W4 Pro
Timekettle
28 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Commute
Travel
Calls
Fitness
Gaming
Music
Spezifikationen
| Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A | Timekettle W4 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | open-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | open-ear |
| Ear Tips | XXS, XS, S, M, L | — |
| Weight | 0.09 kg★ | 0.19 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | Dynamic | — |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, SBC | Timekettle W4 Pro AI Interpreter Earbuds, Real-Time Bidirectional Voice Translation,50+ Languages, Video and Call Bluetooth Translator,for Business, Compatible with iOS/Android Gray |
| Surround | Spatial Audio | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | Adaptive Audio | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs★ | 6 hrs |
| Fast Charging | 5 minutes in the case provides around 1 hour of listening time | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 24 hrs★ | 18 hrs |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2 | 3★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Pattern | — | Bi-Directional |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Android & iOS | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IP57 | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
Timekettle W4 Pro
- Strong mic (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong comfort (71th percentile)
- Strong anc (70th percentile)
- Below average battery (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average sound (27th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Fazit
Gewinner: Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
Scores 93 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 11 of 31 specs.