Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A

Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A

Apple
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
HiFiGo Binary EP321

HiFiGo Binary EP321

HiFiGo
27 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Apple
100
HiFiGo
31
Commute
Apple
96
HiFiGo
20
Travel
Apple
96
HiFiGo
21
Calls
Apple
94
HiFiGo
19
Fitness
Apple
91
HiFiGo
17
Gaming
Apple
81
HiFiGo
29
Music
Apple
75
HiFiGo
37

Spezifikationen

Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/AHiFiGo Binary EP321
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear TipsXXS, XS, S, M, LXS, S, M, L
Weight0.09 kg
Audio
Driver TypeDynamichybrid
Driver Size10 mm
Drivers16
Freq Max40 kHz
Impedance13 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, SBCHiFiGo Binary EP321 MEMS in-Ear Monitor, Direct-Drive MEMS Earphones, 3BA +2DD+1MEMS Hybrid IEM with Iridescent CNC Stainless Steel Faceplates for Musician Audiophile (3.5mm)
SurroundSpatial Audio
Noise Control
ANC
ANC TypeAdaptive Audio
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.3
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs
Fast Charging5 minutes in the case provides around 1 hour of listening time
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery24 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count2
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantSiri
Touch Controls
AppAndroid & iOS
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIP57

Vor- & Nachteile

Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A

  • Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile

HiFiGo Binary EP321

  • Strong sound (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Below average social proof (19th percentile)19th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (26th percentile)
  • Below average comfort (29th percentile)
  • Below average anc (29th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A

Scores 95 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 33 specs.

Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness