Apple AirPods Pro 3
Apple
96 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sennheiser CX CX 300S
Sennheiser
41 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Commute
Travel
Fitness
Calls
Gaming
Music
Spezifikationen
| Apple AirPods Pro 3 | Sennheiser CX CX 300S | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | ear-tip |
| Ear Tips | XXS, XS, S, M, L | XS, S, M, L |
| Weight | 0.01 kg★ | 0.01 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | — |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | — | 17 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 21 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 18 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 118 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Surround | Spatial Audio | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | Adaptive Audio | — |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | — | 3.5mm |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 5 minutes in the case provides around 1 hour of listening time | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | proprietary |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 24 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | proprietary |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Android & iOS | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IP57 | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Apple AirPods Pro 3
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
Sennheiser CX CX 300S
- Strong comfort (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (66th percentile)
- Strong sound (66th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average build (33rd percentile)
- Below average mic (35th percentile)
Preise
Apple AirPods Pro 3
No current pricing available
Sennheiser CX CX 300S
Fazit
Gewinner: Apple AirPods Pro 3
Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 34 specs.
