JVC HAEB75A
JVC
41 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100-K
Technics
100 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Travel
Calls
Music
Commute
Gaming
Fitness
Spezifikationen
| JVC HAEB75A | Technics EAH-AZ100-K | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | ear-clip | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | — | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | 0.03 kg★ | 0.05 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | neodymium | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 13.5 mm★ | 10 mm |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Dolby Atmos |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 8 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | proprietary | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 28 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 6★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| App | — | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | Water-Resistant | IPX4 |
Vor- & Nachteile
JVC HAEB75A
- Strong comfort (74th percentile)
- Strong build (73rd percentile)
- Strong sound (65th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100-K
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
Preise
JVC HAEB75A
Technics EAH-AZ100-K
No current pricing available
Fazit
Gewinner: Technics EAH-AZ100-K
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 19 of 38 specs.
