Apple SweetFlow

Apple SweetFlow

Apple
46 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds Buds3 Pro

Samsung Galaxy Buds Buds3 Pro

Samsung
97 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Apple
54
Samsung
99
Fitness
Apple
48
Samsung
94
Commute
Apple
25
Samsung
90
Travel
Apple
26
Samsung
89
Calls
Apple
29
Samsung
89
Gaming
Apple
37
Samsung
85
Music
Apple
31
Samsung
82

Spezifikationen

Apple SweetFlowSamsung Galaxy Buds Buds3 Pro
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Stylerounded_tiptrue wireless
Ear TipslLarge, Small
Weight0.01 kg0.01 kg
Audio
Driver TypedynamicDynamic
Driver Size10 mm10.5 mm
Drivers12
Freq Max20 kHz96 kHz
Impedance32 Ω16 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, Samsung Seamless, SBC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typeadaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
ProfilesA2DP, AVRCP, HFP, PBP, TMAP
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorLightningBluetooth
Earbud Battery
Battery Life6 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast ChargingYes
ChargingLightningUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery26 hrs
Case ChargingLightningUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Capacity53 mAh
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count6
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantSiriBixby, Google Assistant
Touch Controls
AppiOSGalaxy Wearable App
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceWater-ResistantIP57

Vor- & Nachteile

Apple SweetFlow

  • Strong comfort (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong social proof (76th percentile)
  • Strong build (70th percentile)
  • Below average battery (3th percentile)3th %ile
  • Below average sound (27th percentile)
  • Below average anc (29th percentile)
  • Below average mic (35th percentile)

Samsung Galaxy Buds Buds3 Pro

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Samsung Galaxy Buds Buds3 Pro

Scores 97 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 20 of 37 specs.

Samsung Galaxy Buds Buds3 Pro Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness