Apple SweetFlow

Apple SweetFlow

Apple
46 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony WF-1000XM6

Sony WF-1000XM6

Sony
98 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Calls
Apple
30
Sony
98
Budget
Apple
52
Sony
95
Travel
Apple
27
Sony
94
Fitness
Apple
48
Sony
89
Commute
Apple
26
Sony
88
Music
Apple
31
Sony
86
Gaming
Apple
37
Sony
86

Spezifikationen

Apple SweetFlowSony WF-1000XM6
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Stylerounded_tiptrue wireless
Ear TipslFour Sizes
Weight0.01 kg0.05 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm8.399999618530273 mm
Drivers11
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz40 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typeadaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.3
ProfilesA2DP, AVRCP, HFP, HSP, TMAP
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorLightningSONY WF1000XM6/B Headphones
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging5 min for 1 hour playback
ChargingLightningUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery24 hrs
Case ChargingLightningUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count8
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantSiriBuilt-in voice control
Touch Controls
AppiOSSony | Sound Connect
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceWater-ResistantIPX4

Vor- & Nachteile

Apple SweetFlow

  • Strong comfort (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (76th percentile)
  • Strong build (69th percentile)
  • Below average battery (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average sound (27th percentile)
  • Below average anc (29th percentile)
  • Below average mic (35th percentile)

Sony WF-1000XM6

  • Strong mic (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Sony WF-1000XM6

Scores 98 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 18 of 38 specs.

Sony WF-1000XM6 Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness