ASUS PN54-BB5000ETL-A

ASUS PN54-BB5000ETL-A

ASUS
56 Gesamtbewertung
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
96 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
ASUS
47
HP
91
Creator
ASUS
47
HP
87
Developer
ASUS
55
HP
87
Home Office
ASUS
52
HP
87
Business
ASUS
53
HP
87
Workstation
ASUS
46
HP
86
Ai Llm
ASUS
31
HP
67
Compact
ASUS
57
HP
30

Spezifikationen

ASUS PN54-BB5000ETL-AHP OMEN GT16-0364
Processor
CPU*AMD Ryzen AI 5 340AMD Ryzen 7 8700F★
CPU Multi-Core Score
19,581
30,931
Cores68★
Frequency2.0 GHz4.1 GHz★
L3 Cache8 MB16 MB★
Graphics
GPU*AMD Radeon 840MNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★
GPU Benchmark Score
3,750
28,703
Typediscretediscrete
VRAM—12 GB★
VRAM Type—GDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 1—1 TB★
Storage 1 Type—SSD★
Build
Form Factorminimid-tower
PSU120W850W★
Weight0.54 kg14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports22
USB Ports48★
ThunderboltUSB40
HDMI1x HDMI 2.11 x HDMI
DisplayPort2x DisplayPort 1.43 x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7★Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.4★Bluetooth 5.3
Ethernet2.5 GbEGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Vor- & Nachteile

ASUS PN54-BB5000ETL-A

  • Strong port selection (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong ram (74th percentile)
  • Below average storage (3rd percentile)3rd %ile

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Fazit

★ Gewinner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 12 of 26 specs.

ASUS PN54-BB5000ETL-A Besser bei:

Compact

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation