HP ProDesk 600 G4 Black/Silver 2018
HP
52 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Dell Tower Desktop ECT1250 Black 2025
Dell
82 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Home Office
Business
Developer
Workstation
Compact
Gaming
Ai Llm
Creator
Spezifikationen
| HP ProDesk 600 G4 | Dell Tower Desktop ECT1250 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | Intel Core i5-8500T | Intel Core Ultra 7-265★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 6 | 20★ |
| Frequency | 3.0 GHz★ | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 30 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU* | integrated★ | Intel UHD Graphics |
| GPU Benchmark Score | ||
| Type | discrete | integrated★ |
| VRAM | 4 GB | 48 GB★ |
| VRAM Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 32 GB★ |
| RAM Generation | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Storage 1 | 256 GB | 1 TB★ |
| Storage 1 Type | SSD | SSD |
| Build | ||
| Form Factor | mini | mid-tower |
| PSU | 65W★ | — |
| Weight | 6.13 kg | 6.64 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB Ports | 2 | 7★ |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 port |
| DisplayPort | DisplayPort (x2) | DisplayPort |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5G | Wi-Fi 6E★ |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth | Bluetooth |
| Ethernet | Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet |
| System | ||
| OS | Windows 11 Pro | Windows 11 Home |
Vor- & Nachteile
HP ProDesk 600 G4 Black/Silver 2018
- Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong reliability (70th percentile)
- Below average ram (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average storage (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average cpu (22th percentile)
Dell Tower Desktop ECT1250 Black 2025
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong cpu (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong ram (83th percentile)83th %ile
- Strong port (78th percentile)
- Below average gpu (32th percentile)
Preise
HP ProDesk 600 G4 Black/Silver 20180.006Score pro Dollar
vs
Dell Tower Desktop ECT1250 Black 20250.003Score pro Dollar
HP ProDesk 600 G4 Black/Silver 2018 bietet 2.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
HP ProDesk 600 G4 Black/Silver 2018
Dell Tower Desktop ECT1250 Black 2025
Fazit
Gewinner: Dell Tower Desktop ECT1250
Scores 82 overall, wins 5 of 8 usage categories and 11 of 25 specs.
