HP EliteDesk 8 G1i
HP
74 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Dell Pro Micro Plus QBM1250 2025
Dell
78 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Business
Compact
Home Office
Developer
Workstation
Ai Llm
Creator
Gaming
Spezifikationen
| HP EliteDesk 8 G1i | Dell Pro Micro Plus QBM1250 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | Intel Core Ultra 5 235T | Intel Core Ultra 7★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 14 | 20★ |
| Frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 30 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | Intel Graphics | Intel Graphics |
| GPU Benchmark Score | ||
| Type | integrated | integrated |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 64 GB★ | 32 GB |
| RAM Generation | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB | 1 TB★ |
| Storage 1 Type | SSD | NVMe SSD★ |
| Build | ||
| Form Factor | sff | mini |
| PSU | 90W | 260W★ |
| Weight | 1.35 kg | 1.43 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB Ports | 4 | 6★ |
| Thunderbolt | Thunderbolt 4 x 1 | — |
| HDMI | 1x HDMI 2.1 Output2x DisplayPort 2.1 Output | 3x DisplayPort 1.4a Output |
| DisplayPort | 2x DisplayPort 2.1 Output | 3x DisplayPort 1.4a Output |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7★ | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4★ | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet |
| System | ||
| OS | Windows 11 Pro | Windows 11 Pro |
Vor- & Nachteile
HP EliteDesk 8 G1i
- Strong ram (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong port selection (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong cpu (71st percentile)
- Strong reliability (70th percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
Dell Pro Micro Plus QBM1250 2025
- Strong cpu (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong port selection (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong ram (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong storage (73rd percentile)
- Below average social proof (26th percentile)
Preise
HP EliteDesk 8 G1i0.001Score pro Dollar
vs
Dell Pro Micro Plus QBM1250 20250.002Score pro Dollar
Dell Pro Micro Plus QBM1250 2025 bietet 2.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
HP EliteDesk 8 G1i
Dell Pro Micro Plus QBM1250 2025
Fazit
Gewinner: Dell Pro Micro Plus QBM1250
Scores 78 overall, wins 4 of 8 usage categories and 9 of 24 specs.
