MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
MICRO CENTER
66 Gesamtbewertung
vs
AMD A-Series APU A10-6700 4-core Socket FM2
AMD
50 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Productivity
Budget
Efficiency
Gaming
Ai Llm
Server
Spezifikationen
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | AMD A-Series APU A10-6700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | — | AMD |
| Series | — | A-Series APU |
| Model | — | A10-6700 |
| Codename | — | Richland |
| Class | — | desktop |
| Process | — | 32★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 4★ |
| P-cores | — | 4★ |
| Threads | — | 4★ |
| Base Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Boost Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 4★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 8★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR3, DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | Keine Daten | |
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| Max Memory | — | 64★ |
| ECC | — | ✗ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | — | Socket FM2 |
| PCIe | — | 3.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16★ |
| TDP | — | 65★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | AMD Radeon HD 8670D |
Vor- & Nachteile
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
- Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong efficiency (66th percentile)
- Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile
AMD A-Series APU A10-6700 4-core Socket FM2
- Strong affordability (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong platform (65th percentile)
- Below average social proof (18th percentile)18th %ile
Preise
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF0.003Score pro Dollar
vs
AMD A-Series APU A10-6700 4-core Socket FM20.017Score pro Dollar
AMD A-Series APU A10-6700 4-core Socket FM2 bietet 5.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
Scores 66 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 2 of 26 specs.
