MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
MICRO CENTER
66 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Intel CM8066201928610
Intel
38 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Productivity
Efficiency
Budget
Gaming
Ai Llm
Server
Spezifikationen
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | Intel CM8066201928610 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | — | Intel |
| Series | — | Celeron |
| Model | — | G3900 |
| Class | — | desktop |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 2★ |
| Threads | — | 2★ |
| Base Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 0.5★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR4★ |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | — | LGA 1151 |
| TDP | — | 51★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | Intel HD Graphics 510 |
Vor- & Nachteile
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
- Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong efficiency (67th percentile)
- Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average platform (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
Intel CM8066201928610
- Strong affordability (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (69th percentile)
- Below average ai (24th percentile)
- Below average multi thread (27th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (35th percentile)
Preise
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF0.003Score pro Dollar
vs
Intel CM80662019286100.033Score pro Dollar
Intel CM8066201928610 bietet 11.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
Scores 66 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 2 of 16 specs.
