MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

MICRO CENTER
66 Gesamtbewertung
vs
AMD 100-100000031BOX

AMD 100-100000031BOX

AMD
9 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Productivity
MICRO CENTER
74
AMD
7
Efficiency
MICRO CENTER
65
AMD
6
Gaming
MICRO CENTER
61
AMD
7
Budget
MICRO CENTER
59
AMD
24
Ai Llm
MICRO CENTER
56
AMD
4
Server
MICRO CENTER
54
AMD
5

Spezifikationen

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWFAMD 100-100000031BOX
Performance
PassMark Multi
70,111
Keine Daten
PassMark Single
4,737
Keine Daten

Vor- & Nachteile

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

  • Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong ai (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (67th percentile)
  • Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average platform (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average feature (21st percentile)

AMD 100-100000031BOX

  • Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average ai (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average multi thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average efficiency (3rd percentile)3rd %ile

Preise

AMD 100-100000031BOX is 18.068 MX$ cheaper (5.2x less).

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF0.003Score pro Dollar
vs
AMD 100-100000031BOX0.002Score pro Dollar

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF bietet 1.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

AMD 100-100000031BOX

Fazit

★ Gewinner: MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

Scores 66 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 2 of 2 specs.

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF Besser bei:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

Auch in Betracht ziehen