MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
MICRO CENTER
66 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Intel Celeron G5900 2-core LGA 1200
Intel
43 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Productivity
Budget
Efficiency
Gaming
Ai Llm
Server
Spezifikationen
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | Intel Celeron G5900 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | — | Intel |
| Series | — | Celeron |
| Model | — | G5900 |
| Codename | — | Comet Lake |
| Class | — | desktop |
| Process | — | 14★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 2★ |
| P-cores | — | 4★ |
| Threads | — | 2★ |
| Base Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Boost Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 1★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 2★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | Keine Daten | |
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | — | LGA 1200 |
| PCIe | — | 3.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16★ |
| TDP | — | 58★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
Vor- & Nachteile
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
- Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong efficiency (67th percentile)
- Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
Intel Celeron G5900 2-core LGA 1200
- Strong affordability (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong platform (76th percentile)
- Below average ai (26th percentile)
- Below average multi thread (29th percentile)
Preise
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF0.003Score pro Dollar
vs
Intel Celeron G5900 2-core LGA 12000.031Score pro Dollar
Intel Celeron G5900 2-core LGA 1200 bietet 10.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
Scores 66 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 2 of 25 specs.
