MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
MICRO CENTER
66 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Intel BX8071512100F
Intel
74 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Efficiency
Productivity
Gaming
Ai Llm
Server
Spezifikationen
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | Intel BX8071512100F | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | — | Intel |
| Series | — | Core i3 |
| Model | — | 12100F |
| Codename | — | Alder Lake |
| Class | — | desktop |
| Process | — | 7★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 4★ |
| P-cores | — | 4★ |
| Threads | — | 8★ |
| Base Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Boost Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 5★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 12★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | Keine Daten | |
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| Max Memory | Keine Daten | |
| ECC | — | ✗ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | — | LGA1700 |
| PCIe | — | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20★ |
| TDP | — | 58★ |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 89★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | None Integrated Graphics |
Vor- & Nachteile
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
- Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong efficiency (66th percentile)
- Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile
Intel BX8071512100F
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong single thread (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong platform (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong efficiency (80th percentile)80th %ile
Preise
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF0.003Score pro Dollar
vs
Intel BX8071512100F0.032Score pro Dollar
Intel BX8071512100F bietet 10.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Intel BX8071512100F
Scores 74 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 27 specs.
