MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
MICRO CENTER
66 Gesamtbewertung
vs
AMD EPYC 4564P 16-core AM5
AMD
85 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
Efficiency
Gaming
Budget
Spezifikationen
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | AMD EPYC 4564P | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | — | AMD |
| Series | — | Ryzen 5 |
| Model | — | 4564P |
| Codename | — | Raphael |
| Class | — | server |
| Process | — | 5★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 16★ |
| P-cores | — | 16★ |
| Threads | — | 32★ |
| Base Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Boost Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 16★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 64★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR5★ |
| Max Speed | Keine Daten | |
| Max Memory | Keine Daten | |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | — | AM5 |
| PCIe | — | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 28★ |
| TDP | — | 200★ |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 230★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | Radeon Graphics |
Vor- & Nachteile
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
- Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong efficiency (67th percentile)
- Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average platform (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
AMD EPYC 4564P 16-core AM5
- Strong ai (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong multi thread (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong single thread (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong platform (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average affordability (10th percentile)10th %ile
Preise
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF0.003Score pro Dollar
vs
AMD EPYC 4564P 16-core AM50.004Score pro Dollar
AMD EPYC 4564P 16-core AM5 bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: AMD EPYC 4564P
Scores 85 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 26 specs.
