Intel Core Ultra 265K 20-core LGA1851
Intel
82 Gesamtbewertung
vs
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
MICRO CENTER
66 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Productivity
Ai Llm
Efficiency
Budget
Gaming
Server
Spezifikationen
| Intel Core Ultra 265K | MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | — |
| Series | Core Ultra 7 | — |
| Model | 265K | — |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | — |
| Class | desktop | — |
| Process | 3★ | — |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 20★ | — |
| P-cores | 8★ | — |
| E-cores | 12★ | — |
| Threads | 20★ | — |
| Base Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Boost Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 24★ | — |
| L3 Cache | 30★ | — |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR5★ | — |
| Max Speed | Keine Daten | |
| Channels | 2★ | — |
| Max Memory | Keine Daten | |
| ECC | ✓★ | — |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA1851 | — |
| PCIe | 5.0 | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20★ | — |
| TDP | 125★ | — |
| Max Turbo Power | 250★ | — |
| Unlocked | ✓★ | — |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Intel Core Ultra 265K 20-core LGA1851
- Strong single thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong efficiency (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong platform (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong ai (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Below average affordability (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average social proof (25th percentile)
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
- Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong efficiency (67th percentile)
- Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
Preise
Intel Core Ultra 265K 20-core LGA1851
No current pricing available
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
Fazit
Gewinner: Intel Core Ultra 265K
Scores 82 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 19 of 28 specs.
