AMD 100-100000725WOF

AMD 100-100000725WOF

AMD
74 Gesamtbewertung
vs
CG CHIPS GATE CJ2M-CPU33--NEW--HW

CG CHIPS GATE CJ2M-CPU33--NEW--HW

CG CHIPS GATE
8 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Server
AMD
92
CG CHIPS GATE
5
Productivity
AMD
89
CG CHIPS GATE
6
Ai Llm
AMD
86
CG CHIPS GATE
4
Budget
AMD
50
CG CHIPS GATE
10
Gaming
AMD
46
CG CHIPS GATE
6
Efficiency
AMD
37
CG CHIPS GATE
5

Spezifikationen

AMD 100-100000725WOFCG CHIPS GATE CJ2M-CPU33--NEW--HW
Processor
BrandAMD—
SeriesRyzen Threadripper PRO—
Model9955WX—
CodenameShimada Peak—
Classhedtdesktop
Process4★—
Cores & Clocks
Cores16★—
P-cores16★—
Threads32★—
Base Clock
4,500
Keine Daten
Boost Clock
5,400
Keine Daten
Cache
L2 Cache16★—
L3 Cache64★—
Performance
PassMark Multi
67,123
Keine Daten
PassMark Single
4,548
Keine Daten
Memory
Memory TypeDDR5★—
Max Speed
6,400
Keine Daten
Channels8★—
Max Memory
2,048
Keine Daten
ECC✓★—
Platform & Power
SocketsTR5—
PCIe5.0—
PCIe Lanes
148
Keine Daten
TDP350★—
Max Turbo Power350★—
Unlocked✓★—
Graphics & AI
Integrated GraphicsNone Integrated Graphics—

Vor- & Nachteile

AMD 100-100000725WOF

  • Strong platform (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong ai (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong single thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Below average social proof (5th percentile)5th %ile

CG CHIPS GATE CJ2M-CPU33--NEW--HW

  • Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average ai (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile

Preise

CG CHIPS GATE CJ2M-CPU33--NEW--HW is 23.088 MX$ cheaper (3.1x less).

AMD 100-100000725WOF0.002Score pro Dollar
vs
CG CHIPS GATE CJ2M-CPU33--NEW--HW0.001Score pro Dollar

AMD 100-100000725WOF bietet 2.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

AMD 100-100000725WOF

CG CHIPS GATE CJ2M-CPU33--NEW--HW

Fazit

★ Gewinner: AMD 100-100000725WOF

Scores 74 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 19 of 27 specs.

AMD 100-100000725WOF Besser bei:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

Auch in Betracht ziehen