Intel Desktop Processors Core Ultra 7 265KF 20-core LGA1851

Intel Desktop Processors Core Ultra 7 265KF 20-core LGA1851

Intel
64 Gesamtbewertung
vs
SMC EPYC 9555P 64-core AMD Socket SP5

SMC EPYC 9555P 64-core AMD Socket SP5

SMC
80 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Productivity
Intel
73
SMC
94
Server
Intel
50
SMC
89
Ai Llm
Intel
57
SMC
85
Gaming
Intel
65
SMC
50
Efficiency
Intel
61
SMC
42
Budget
Intel
54
SMC
42

Spezifikationen

Intel Desktop Processors Core Ultra 7 265KFSMC EPYC 9555P
Processor
BrandIntelAMD
SeriesCore Ultra 7EPYC
Model265KF9555P
Codename—Turin
Classdesktopserver
Process—4★
Cores & Clocks
Cores2064★
P-cores864★
E-cores12★—
ThreadsKeine Daten
128
Base ClockKeine Daten
3,200
Boost ClockKeine Daten
4,400
Cache
L2 Cache—64★
L3 CacheKeine Daten
256
Performance
PassMark Multi
58,410
123,576
PassMark Single
4,922
3,410
Memory
Memory Type—DDR5★
Max SpeedKeine Daten
6,000
ECC—✓★
Platform & Power
SocketLGA1851AMD Socket SP5
PCIe—5.0
PCIe LanesKeine Daten
128
TDP—360★
Max Turbo Power—400★
Unlocked✓★✗

Vor- & Nachteile

Intel Desktop Processors Core Ultra 7 265KF 20-core LGA1851

  • Strong single thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong ai (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average affordability (0th percentile)0th %ile
  • Below average platform (17th percentile)17th %ile

SMC EPYC 9555P 64-core AMD Socket SP5

  • Strong multi thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong ai (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong platform (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average affordability (1st percentile)1st %ile

Fazit

★ Gewinner: SMC EPYC 9555P

Scores 80 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 25 specs.

Intel Desktop Processors Core Ultra 7 265KF Besser bei:

BudgetGamingEfficiency

SMC EPYC 9555P Besser bei:

Ai LlmServerProductivity