Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1700

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1700

Intel
81 Gesamtbewertung
vs
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

MICRO CENTER
66 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Efficiency
Intel
93
MICRO CENTER
65
Productivity
Intel
87
MICRO CENTER
74
Ai Llm
Intel
86
MICRO CENTER
56
Gaming
Intel
74
MICRO CENTER
61
Budget
Intel
74
MICRO CENTER
59
Server
Intel
70
MICRO CENTER
54

Spezifikationen

Intel Core Ultra 9 285KMICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
Processor
BrandIntel—
SeriesCore Ultra 9—
Model285K—
CodenameArrow Lake-S—
Classdesktop—
Process3★—
Cores & Clocks
Cores24★—
P-cores8★—
E-cores16★—
Threads4★—
Base Clock
3,000
Keine Daten
Boost Clock
5,200
Keine Daten
Cache
L2 Cache24★—
L3 Cache36★—
Performance
PassMark Multi
67,229
70,111
PassMark Single
5,087
4,737
Memory
Memory TypeDDR2—
Max Speed
6,400
Keine Daten
Max Memory
192
Keine Daten
ECC✓★—
Platform & Power
SocketLGA1700—
PCIe3.0—
PCIe Lanes28★—
TDP65★—
Max Turbo Power100★—
Unlocked✗—
Graphics & AI
Integrated GraphicsArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU—
NPU TOPS13★—

Vor- & Nachteile

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1700

  • Strong efficiency (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong single thread (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong ai (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Below average affordability (11th percentile)11th %ile

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

  • Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong ai (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (67th percentile)
  • Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average platform (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average feature (21st percentile)

Preise

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1700

No current pricing available

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Scores 81 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 17 of 28 specs.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Besser bei:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

Auch in Betracht ziehen