FJFJOPK DC402 Black 2025
FJFJOPK
35 Gesamtbewertung
vs
FlyFrost DC226 2026
FlyFrost
46 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Product Photography
Video
Youtube
Photography
Beginner
Streaming
Wedding Events
Vlogging
Sports Wildlife
Travel
Spezifikationen
| FJFJOPK DC402 | FlyFrost DC226 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Megapixels | 48 MP | 88 MP★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K | 8K★ |
| Log Profile | ✓ | ✓ |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 3.2"★ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✓★ |
| Build | ||
| Weight | 0.30 kg★ | 1.03 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | ✓★ |
| USB | Type-C | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
FJFJOPK DC402 Black 2025
- Strong social proof (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong sensor (74th percentile)
- Strong video (71st percentile)
- Below average build (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average display (31st percentile)
- Below average burst (34th percentile)
FlyFrost DC226 2026
- Strong video (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong sensor (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong social proof (79th percentile)
- Strong display (65th percentile)
- Below average burst (34th percentile)
Preise
FJFJOPK DC402 Black 20250.020Score pro Dollar
vs
FlyFrost DC226 20260.016Score pro Dollar
FJFJOPK DC402 Black 2025 bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
FJFJOPK DC402 Black 2025
FlyFrost DC226 2026
Fazit
Gewinner: FlyFrost DC226
Scores 46 overall, wins 8 of 10 usage categories and 5 of 9 specs.
