FLATIC

FLATIC

FLATIC
33 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMW White

Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMW White

Kodak
26 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Video
FLATIC
40
Kodak
18
Product Photography
FLATIC
38
Kodak
25
Photography
FLATIC
37
Kodak
20
Beginner
FLATIC
37
Kodak
27
Wedding Events
FLATIC
33
Kodak
18
Youtube
FLATIC
31
Kodak
18
Streaming
FLATIC
25
Kodak
28
Sports Wildlife
FLATIC
26
Kodak
16
Travel
FLATIC
24
Kodak
20
Vlogging
FLATIC
23
Kodak
15

Spezifikationen

FLATICKodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMW
Sensor
TypeCMOS
Size1/3-inch
Megapixels64 MP
Video
Max Resolution5K
Log Profile
Build
Weight0.78 kg0.45 kg
Connectivity
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
USBUSB

Vor- & Nachteile

FLATIC

  • Strong video (76th percentile)
  • Strong sensor (74th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (73th percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average display (25th percentile)
  • Below average burst (28th percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (32th percentile)

Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMW White

  • Below average video (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average build (21th percentile)
  • Below average display (25th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (26th percentile)

Preise

FLATIC is 745 MX$ cheaper (1.5x less).

FLATIC0.021Score pro Dollar
vs
Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMW White0.011Score pro Dollar

FLATIC bietet 1.9x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMW White

Fazit

Gewinner: FLATIC

Scores 33 overall, wins 9 of 10 usage categories and 2 of 9 specs.

FLATIC Besser bei:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography

Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMW Besser bei:

Streaming

Auch in Betracht ziehen