Minolta MND65 MND65 Black
Minolta
25 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Ricoh GR GR IV HDF Black
Ricoh
43 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Product Photography
Photography
Streaming
Video
Beginner
Youtube
Vlogging
Wedding Events
Travel
Sports Wildlife
Spezifikationen
| Minolta MND65 MND65 | Ricoh GR GR IV HDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | 1/2.3-inch | aps-c |
| Megapixels | 13 MP | 25.739999771118164 MP★ |
| ISO Range | — | 100★ |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | 1★ | — |
| AF Type | — | Auto-area AF, Zone AF, Select AF, Pinpoint AF, Tracking AF, Cont |
| Eye AF | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 6 fps★ | — |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/4000 |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K★ | 1080p |
| 4K FPS | 60 fps★ | — |
| 1080p FPS | 120 fps★ | 60 fps |
| Codec | H.264 | H.264 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3" | 3" |
| Touchscreen | — | ✓★ |
| Articulating | — | ✗ |
| Build | ||
| Weight | 0.25 kg | 0.23 kg★ |
| Battery Life | — | 250 shots★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | — | ✓★ |
| USB | USB-C★ | USB Type-C |
| Hot Shoe | ✓ | ✓ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Minolta MND65 MND65 Black
- Strong connectivity (74th percentile)
- Strong stabilization (70th percentile)
- Below average af (1th percentile)1th %ile
- Below average sensor (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average build (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average social proof (10th percentile)10th %ile
Ricoh GR GR IV HDF Black
- Strong sensor (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83th percentile)83th %ile
- Strong connectivity (70th percentile)
- Below average battery (2th percentile)2th %ile
- Below average build (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average burst (27th percentile)
- Below average evf (34th percentile)
Preise
Minolta MND65 MND65 Black0.006Score pro Dollar
vs
Ricoh GR GR IV HDF Black0.001Score pro Dollar
Minolta MND65 MND65 Black bietet 6.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Minolta MND65 MND65 Black
Ricoh GR GR IV HDF Black
Fazit
Gewinner: Ricoh GR GR IV HDF
Scores 43 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 8 of 23 specs.
