Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green

Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green

Fujifilm
20 Gesamtbewertung
vs
SINEXE LXT-DC089-03

SINEXE LXT-DC089-03

SINEXE
46 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Youtube
Fujifilm
15
SINEXE
62
Product Photography
Fujifilm
12
SINEXE
58
Video
Fujifilm
15
SINEXE
58
Beginner
Fujifilm
24
SINEXE
48
Photography
Fujifilm
14
SINEXE
47
Vlogging
Fujifilm
15
SINEXE
45
Streaming
Fujifilm
20
SINEXE
43
Wedding Events
Fujifilm
13
SINEXE
41
Sports Wildlife
Fujifilm
14
SINEXE
30
Travel
Fujifilm
13
SINEXE
27

Spezifikationen

Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400SINEXE LXT-DC089-03
Sensor
TypeCMOSCMOS
Size1/1.7-inch1/2.3-inch
Megapixels10 MP88 MP★
Autofocus
Eye AF✗—
Animal AF✗—
Subject Detection✗—
Shooting
Electronic Shutter✗—
Video
Max Resolution—8K★
Log Profile—✓★
Display & EVF
Screen Size—3"★
Touchscreen✗—
Articulating✗✓★
Build
Weight0.20 kg★—
Connectivity
Wi-Fi✗✓★
Bluetooth✗✗
Hot Shoe✗—

Vor- & Nachteile

Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Below average sensor (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average build (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (22nd percentile)
  • Below average video (24th percentile)

SINEXE LXT-DC089-03

  • Strong video (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong sensor (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong display (73rd percentile)
  • Strong social proof (68th percentile)
  • Below average burst (34th percentile)

Preise

Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green is 2.147 MX$ cheaper (3.6x less).

Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green0.025Score pro Dollar
vs
SINEXE LXT-DC089-030.015Score pro Dollar

Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green bietet 1.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green

SINEXE LXT-DC089-03

Fazit

★ Gewinner: SINEXE LXT-DC089-03

Scores 46 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 6 of 16 specs.

SINEXE LXT-DC089-03 Besser bei:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography

Auch in Betracht ziehen