Sigma fp fp
Sigma
52 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Kodak Charmera Charmera
Kodak
29 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Travel
Sports Wildlife
Wedding Events
Streaming
Beginner
Video
Product Photography
Photography
Youtube
Vlogging
Spezifikationen
| Sigma fp fp | Kodak Charmera Charmera | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | BSI CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | full-frame | 1/2.3-inch |
| Megapixels | 24.600000381469727 MP★ | 1.600000023841858 MP |
| ISO Range | 100 | 100 |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | 49★ | — |
| AF Type | Contrast Detection: 49 | — |
| Eye AF | ✓★ | — |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 18 fps | 30 fps★ |
| Burst (Electronic) | 18 fps★ | — |
| Max Shutter | 1/8000 | — |
| Electronic Shutter | ✓ | ✓ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K★ | 1080p |
| 4K FPS | 30 fps★ | — |
| 1080p FPS | 120 fps★ | 30 fps |
| 10-bit | ✓★ | — |
| RAW Video | ✓★ | — |
| Codec | CinemaDNG | AVI |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3.2"★ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Articulating | ✗ | — |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.37 kg★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 Type-C | USB-C★ |
| HDMI | Micro-HDMI | — |
| Hot Shoe | ✓★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma fp fp
- Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong burst (81th percentile)81th %ile
- Strong video (71th percentile)
- Strong connectivity (69th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average stabilization (32th percentile)
Kodak Charmera Charmera
- Strong burst (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average sensor (0th percentile)0th %ile
- Below average video (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average display (25th percentile)
- Below average stabilization (32th percentile)
Preise
Sigma fp fp0.001Score pro Dollar
vs
Kodak Charmera Charmera0.005Score pro Dollar
Kodak Charmera Charmera bietet 5.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Sigma fp fp
Kodak Charmera Charmera
Fazit
Gewinner: Sigma fp fp
Scores 52 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 14 of 25 specs.
