Anker SoloCam T8170

Anker SoloCam T8170

Anker
29 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II Black 2015

Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II Black 2015

Olympus
59 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Sports Wildlife
Anker
28
Olympus
65
Vlogging
Anker
15
Olympus
64
Beginner
Anker
31
Olympus
63
Travel
Anker
30
Olympus
61
Streaming
Anker
24
Olympus
61
Video
Anker
23
Olympus
59
Wedding Events
Anker
25
Olympus
59
Youtube
Anker
18
Olympus
58
Photography
Anker
22
Olympus
57
Product Photography
Anker
21
Olympus
51

Spezifikationen

Anker SoloCam T8170Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II
Sensor
TypeLive MOS
Size1/2.3-inchmicro-four-thirds
Megapixels3 MP16.100000381469727 MP
ISO Range100
ProcessorTruePic VII
Autofocus
AF Points81
AF Type81
Shooting
Burst (Mechanical)10 fps
Max Shutter1/8000
Electronic Shutter
Video
Max Resolution1080p
1080p FPS60 fps
RAW Video
Codecvarious codecs
Display & EVF
Screen Size3"
Touchscreen
Articulating
EVF Resolution2.4M dots
Build
Weather Sealed
Weight0.63 kg0.41 kg
Connectivity
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Hot Shoe

Vor- & Nachteile

Anker SoloCam T8170

  • Strong build (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong social proof (77th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average video (23rd percentile)
  • Below average display (28th percentile)
  • Below average burst (32nd percentile)

Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II Black 2015

  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong evf (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong social proof (79th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (17th percentile)17th %ile

Preise

Anker SoloCam T8170

Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II Black 2015

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gewinner: Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II

Scores 59 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 13 of 23 specs.

Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II Besser bei:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography

Auch in Betracht ziehen