Kodak PIXPRO C1 Tan
Kodak
24 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Minolta MNB5Z White
Minolta
35 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Video
Product Photography
Streaming
Beginner
Youtube
Photography
Wedding Events
Vlogging
Travel
Sports Wildlife
Spezifikationen
| Kodak PIXPRO C1 | Minolta MNB5Z | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | — |
| Size | 1/2.3-inch | — |
| Megapixels | 13 MP | 56 MP★ |
| ISO Range | 100★ | — |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | 1★ | — |
| AF Type | TTL Autofocus | — |
| Eye AF | ✓★ | — |
| Shooting | ||
| Max Shutter | 1/10000 | — |
| Electronic Shutter | ✓★ | — |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 1080p★ | 5K |
| 1080p FPS | 60 fps★ | — |
| Codec | H.264 | — |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 2.8" | 2.8" |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Articulating | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Build | ||
| Weight | 0.11 kg★ | 0.15 kg |
| Battery Life | 200 shots★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✗ | — |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | — |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C |
Vor- & Nachteile
Kodak PIXPRO C1 Tan
- Strong stabilization (71th percentile)
- Below average af (1th percentile)1th %ile
- Below average battery (1th percentile)1th %ile
- Below average build (1th percentile)1th %ile
- Below average sensor (7th percentile)7th %ile
Minolta MNB5Z White
- Strong video (72th percentile)
- Strong sensor (69th percentile)
- Below average build (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average burst (28th percentile)
- Below average af (32th percentile)
- Below average stabilization (32th percentile)
Preise
Kodak PIXPRO C1 Tan0.011Score pro Dollar
vs
Minolta MNB5Z White0.008Score pro Dollar
Kodak PIXPRO C1 Tan bietet 1.4x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Kodak PIXPRO C1 Tan
Minolta MNB5Z White
Fazit
Gewinner: Minolta MNB5Z
Scores 35 overall, wins 9 of 10 usage categories and 2 of 20 specs.
