Samsung QET QE50T 50"
Samsung
43 التقييم العام
مقابل
Dell UltraSharp U3425WE 34.1" Silver 2023
Dell
90 التقييم العام
التقييمات
Office
Entertainment
Professional
Creative
Gaming
Portable
المواصفات
| Samsung QET QE50T 50" | Dell UltraSharp U3425WE 34.1" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 50" | 34.1" |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3440 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | LCD | IPS★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 21:9 |
| Curved | — | ✓ |
| Curvature | — | 1,900 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 8 ms | 5 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | — | G-Sync Compatible★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | 16.7 Million Colors (8-Bit) | 98% DCI-P3, 100% sRGB |
| Color Depth | 8-bit | 8-Bit+FRC |
| HDR | — | DisplayHDR 400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | 1 |
| DisplayPort | — | 1★ |
| USB-C | — | 4★ |
| Thunderbolt | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Speakers | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | — | ✓★ |
| Tilt | — | ✓★ |
| Swivel | — | ✓★ |
| Pivot | ✗ | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | 200x200 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Power | 95W | 32W★ |
| Weight | 11.70 kg | 10.81 kg★ |
الإيجابيات والسلبيات
Samsung QET QE50T 50"
- Strong display (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Below average performance (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average feature (23rd percentile)
- Below average portability (25th percentile)
- Below average ergonomic (35th percentile)
Dell UltraSharp U3425WE 34.1" Silver 2023
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong feature (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong portability (87th percentile)87th %ile
الأسعار
Samsung QET QE50T 50"0.002نقاط لكل دولار
مقابل
Dell UltraSharp U3425WE 34.1" Silver 20230.005نقاط لكل دولار
Dell UltraSharp U3425WE 34.1" Silver 2023 يقدم قيمة أفضل بـ 2.5x مقابل المال
Samsung QET QE50T 50"
Dell UltraSharp U3425WE 34.1" Silver 2023
الحكم النهائي
الفائز: Dell UltraSharp U3425WE 34.1"
Scores 90 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 29 specs.
