Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra 11" Armor Pad 5 Ultra Black 2025
Ulefone
55 综合评分
vs
Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG Gray 2025
Xiaomi
77 综合评分
买家怎么说
Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra 11" Armor Pad 5 Ultra Black 2025
暂无用户反馈
Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG Gray 2025
88 满分 100 置信度中 13 条评价
小米平板因其出色的性价比、流畅的性能和鲜艳的显示屏而广受好评。用户强调快速的144Hz刷新率、良好的电池续航和高级的做工。一些人指出自动刷新率可能会使平板变慢，并且像荣耀Magic Pad 2这样的竞争对手在价格上提供更多，但总体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 出色的性价比
- 流畅的144Hz显示屏
- 良好的电池续航
- 高级做工
- 附带45W充电器的快速充电
缺点
- 自动刷新率可能使平板变慢
- 竞争对手提供更多价值
- 没有最新的骁龙CPU
- 没有合适的适配器充电慢
- 小米不提供操作系统更新
Value for money 6
Display quality 5
Performance 5
Battery life 3
Build quality 4
Audio quality 2
评分
Entertainment
Reading
Art Design
Student
Productivity
Business
规格
| Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra 11" Armor Pad 5 Ultra | Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | 2.6 GHz | 2800 MHz |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 12 GB★ | 8 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB★ | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | — | SSD★ |
| Expandable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Display | ||
| Size | 11" | 11.2" |
| Resolution | — | 3200 px★ |
| Panel | — | LCD |
| Refresh Rate | — | 144 Hz★ |
| Brightness | 600 nits | 800 nits★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.4★ |
| USB-C | — | 1★ |
| Cellular | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Stylus Support | — | ✓★ |
| Fingerprint Reader | ✓★ | — |
| IP Rating | IP68/69K | — |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.60 kg | 0.45 kg★ |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 |
优缺点
Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra 11" Armor Pad 5 Ultra Black 2025
- Strong cpu (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong gpu (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong storage (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong ram (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average battery (30th percentile)
Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG Gray 2025
- Strong screen (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong cpu (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong gpu (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
结论
胜出: Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG
Scores 77 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 20 specs.