ASUS Eye Care VA249HG 24"
ASUS
57 综合评分
vs
HP OMEN 27qs G2 27" Negro 2025
HP
86 综合评分
买家怎么说
ASUS Eye Care VA249HG 24"
暂无用户反馈
HP OMEN 27qs G2 27" Negro 2025
92 满分 100 置信度中 13 条评价
用户喜爱HP Omen显示器出色的性能、清晰的QHD显示和高刷新率，非常适合游戏和工作。内置扬声器、可调节支架和时尚设计备受称赞，但评论者建议购买保护计划以防烧屏。总体而言，这是一款多功能、高质量的显示器，经常打折。
优点
- 出色的性能
- 清晰的QHD分辨率
- 高刷新率的流畅度
- 内置扬声器
- 可调节支架
缺点
- 潜在的烧屏风险
- 略高的价格
- 内置扬声器非高端
Performance 5
Display quality 4
Refresh rate 3
Built in speakers 2
Build quality 2
Value for money 3
评分
Office
Gaming
Professional
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
规格
| ASUS Eye Care VA249HG 24" | HP OMEN 27qs G2 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 24" | 27" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS | IPS |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Screen Finish | matte | matte |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 280 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | Adaptive-Sync | G-Sync Compatible★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 300 nits | 400 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 99% sRGB | 95 percent |
| Color Depth | 8-bit★ | — |
| HDR | HDR10 | VESA Certified DisplayHDR 400 |
| HDR Support | — | HDR400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | 0 | 1★ |
| USB-C | 0 | 1★ |
| Thunderbolt | — | N/A |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Pivot | ✗ | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | Yes | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | — |
| Power | 15W★ | 106W |
| Weight | 3.20 kg★ | 8.35 kg |
优缺点
ASUS Eye Care VA249HG 24"
- Strong performance (70th percentile)
- Strong feature (70th percentile)
- Strong color (69th percentile)
- Strong social proof (69th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (22nd percentile)
HP OMEN 27qs G2 27" Negro 2025
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
结论
胜出: HP OMEN 27qs G2 27"
Scores 86 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 30 specs.