Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM 200-800mm
Canon
38 综合评分
vs
Sony FE SELP1635G 16-35mm
Sony
76 综合评分
评分
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Budget
Travel
Video Cinema
Street
Macro
Portrait
规格
| Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM 200-800mm | Sony FE SELP1635G 16-35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 200 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 800 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | — | 13 |
| Groups | — | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 2★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | — | Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/9 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/6.3 | f/4 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Sony E |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 3.17 kg | 0.35 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 72 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | USM | XD Linear Motors★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 240 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.19x★ |
优缺点
Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM 200-800mm
- Strong af (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average build (0th percentile)0th %ile
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
Sony FE SELP1635G 16-35mm
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong stabilization (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong optical (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
价格
Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM 200-800mm
Sony FE SELP1635G 16-35mm
结论
胜出: Sony FE SELP1635G 16-35mm
Scores 76 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 11 of 22 specs.
