Olympus M.ZUIKO Digital ED 40-150mm f:4.0-5.6 R
Olympus
59 综合评分
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm
Nikon
91 综合评分
买家怎么说
Olympus M.ZUIKO Digital ED 40-150mm f:4.0-5.6 R
暂无用户反馈
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm
92 满分 100 置信度中 11 条评价
腾龙17-28mm f/2.8镜头因其锐度、紧凑的尺寸和出色的低光性能而备受赞誉。用户喜欢它在旅行、视频和长时间曝光方面的多功能性，并经常将其与预算三剑客中的其他镜头搭配使用。一些人指出它不如S系列或尼康14-30mm那样高端，但大多数人认为它提供了令人难以置信的性价比。
优点
- 图像锐利
- 紧凑轻便
- 出色的低光性能
- 性价比高
- 旅行和视频多功能
缺点
- 不如S系列镜头高端
- 有些人更喜欢更宽的14-30mm范围
- 做工不如高端三剑客出色
Image quality 8
Build quality 5
Value for money 6
Low light performance 4
Size and weight 5
Versatility 5
评分
Professional
Portrait
Budget
Macro
Street
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
规格
| Olympus M.ZUIKO Digital ED 40-150mm f:4.0-5.6 R | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 40 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 150 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | — | 13 |
| Groups | — | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | — | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/4 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Nikon Z |
| Format | micro-four-thirds | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.19 kg★ | 0.45 kg |
| Filter Thread | 58 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | MSC | Stepping Motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 900 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:6.25 | 1:5.26 |
优缺点
Olympus M.ZUIKO Digital ED 40-150mm f:4.0-5.6 R
- Strong versatility (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average optical (19th percentile)19th %ile
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile
价格
结论
胜出: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
