Nikon NIKKOR 1910 16mm
Nikon
63 综合评分
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II
Sony
74 综合评分
评分
Travel
Landscape
Street
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Macro
Professional
Video Cinema
规格
| Nikon NIKKOR 1910 16mm | Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | fisheye | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 16 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | — | 9 |
| Groups | — | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Coating | Nikon super integrated coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/5.6 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.29 kg | 0.11 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 39 mm | 41 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | D-type autofocus | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm | 250 mm |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.215x★ |
优缺点
Nikon NIKKOR 1910 16mm
- Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong bokeh (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong macro (77th percentile)
- Strong build (77th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong optical (69th percentile)
- Below average social proof (21st percentile)
结论
胜出: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II
Scores 74 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.