Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm

Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm

Meike
65 综合评分
vs
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Canon
84 综合评分

买家怎么说

Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm

82 满分 100 置信度低 6 条评价

这款紧凑型220度圆形鱼眼镜头以其坚固的全金属结构、清晰的光学性能以及出色的性价比给用户留下了深刻印象。尽管它小巧到可以放进口袋,却能提供适合创意和夜景摄影的戏剧性视角。一些小的不足之处包括在Micro Four Thirds机身上安装较紧,以及前镜头盖有待改进,但总体而言,它被称赞为一款有趣且价格合理的超级鱼眼镜头。

优点
  • 全金属结构
  • 光学清晰
  • 小巧便携
  • 性价比极高
  • 创造戏剧性视角
缺点
  • 在相机机身上安装较紧
  • 前镜头盖质量一般
  • 安装时没有牢固的握持面
👍 Build quality 4
👍 Image quality 4
👍 Value for money 3
👍 Compactness 3
👎 Mounting difficulty 1
👎 Lens cap quality 2

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

82 满分 100 置信度高 331 条评价

佳能 EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 镜头因其出色的锐度、快速安静的自动对焦和轻巧的设计而广受赞誉,对于业余摄影师和野生动物爱好者来说,性价比极高。许多用户强调长焦端令人印象深刻的画质和有效的图像稳定功能,尽管有些人注意到超过 200mm 时画质变软,最大光圈下有明显暗角。少数评论者遇到了质量控制问题,如图像模糊或对焦环失灵,但压倒性的共识是,这款镜头在其价位上提供了卓越的性能。

优点
  • 价格下出色的锐度
  • 快速安静的STM自动对焦
  • 轻巧紧凑的设计
  • 有效的图像稳定
  • 极佳的性价比
缺点
  • 超过200mm画质变软
  • 最大光圈下明显暗角
  • 塑料制造工艺
  • 电子手动对焦需要相机供电
  • 最大光圈较慢(250mm 时为 f/5.6)
👍 Image quality 45
👍 Autofocus performance 30
👍 Value for money 35
🤔 Build quality 20
👍 Image stabilization 18
🤔 Sharpness at long end 25

评分

Budget
Meike
57
Canon
93
Travel
Meike
47
Canon
81
Street
Meike
64
Canon
79
Portrait
Meike
69
Canon
78
Wildlife Sports
Meike
36
Canon
78
Video Cinema
Meike
56
Canon
77
Macro
Meike
71
Canon
62
Landscape
Meike
39
Canon
70
Professional
Meike
55
Canon
67

规格

Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mmCanon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM
Optics
Typefisheyezoom
Focal Length Min4 mm55 mm
Focal Length Max4 mm250 mm
Elements1015
Groups712
Aspherical Elements—0★
ED Elements—1★
Coatingmulti-layer nano-coatingSuper Spectra coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/4
Min Aperturef/2.84-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountMicro Four ThirdsCanon EF-S
Formatmicro-four-thirdsAPS-C★
Weather Sealed—✗
Weight0.19 kg★0.38 kg
Filter Thread61 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlySTM★
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance95 mm★850 mm
Max Magnification—0.29x★

优缺点

Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm

  • Strong macro (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong social proof (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average macro (32nd percentile)

价格

Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm is JP¥52,195 cheaper (3.1x less).

Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm0.003每美元得分
vs
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM0.001每美元得分

Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm 性价比高 3.0 倍

Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

结论

★ 胜出: Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Scores 84 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye 4mm 更擅长:

Macro

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 更擅长:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

也值得考虑