Middle Rabbit SW4 Pro
Middle Rabbit
27 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 综合评分
买家怎么说
Middle Rabbit SW4 Pro
72 满分 100 置信度中 13 条评价
Middle Rabbit 耳机在音质、低延迟以及 2.4GHz 和蓝牙模式之间的无缝切换方面普遍获得好评。许多用户喜欢通过应用程序自定义触摸控制和均衡器，以及出色的无线范围。然而，一些评论强调了电池续航（通常低于 4 小时）、充电不一致以及与 PS5 的连接问题等重大问题。暴露的充电盒设计是一个常见的抱怨，不过客户服务在解决问题方面受到称赞。
优点
- 出色的音质
- 低延迟 2.4GHz 连接
- 无缝蓝牙/2.4GHz 切换
- 通过应用程序自定义触摸控制
- 出色的全屋无线范围
缺点
- 电池续航短（3-4小时）
- 充电不一致的问题
- 与 PS5 的连接问题
- 充电盒中耳机柄暴露
- 意外触摸控制激活
Battery life 5
Sound quality 8
Connectivity 6
Customer service 3
Charging issues 4
Wireless range 4
Technics EAH-AZ100
88 满分 100 置信度中 28 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ100 耳机因其卓越的音质而广受赞誉，用户强调深沉的低音、清晰的高音和沉浸式音频。舒适度、电池续航和降噪功能也经常受到称赞，尽管一些用户指出价格较高且音量有限。提到了蓝牙 LE 断开和初始多设备配对等小问题，但总体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 深沉沉浸式低音
- 有效的降噪功能
- 舒适的佩戴感
- 出色的电池续航
缺点
- 价格较高
- 最大音量有限
- 蓝牙 LE 断开
- 多设备配对问题
- 塑料外壳
Sound quality 12
Bass performance 6
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 6
Battery life 5
Value for money 4
评分
Calls
Travel
Music
Commute
Gaming
Budget
Fitness
规格
| Middle Rabbit SW4 Pro | Technics EAH-AZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | — | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | — | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | — | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 12 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | LC3 | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Dolby Atmos, Spatial Audio |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 6 hrs | 8 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 32 hrs★ | 28 hrs |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 4 | 6★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Middle Rabbit App | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX4 |
优缺点
Middle Rabbit SW4 Pro
- Strong connectivity (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong sound (71st percentile)
- Strong social proof (67th percentile)
- Below average battery (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average comfort (28th percentile)
- Below average anc (31st percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (34th percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
价格
Middle Rabbit SW4 Pro
Technics EAH-AZ100
No current pricing available
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 39 specs.
