CCA CRA PRO
CCA
41 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 综合评分
买家怎么说
CCA CRA PRO
78 满分 100 置信度低 9 条评价
CCA CRA+ 以其低廉的价格提供了令人印象深刻的音质，许多用户称赞其清晰度和重低音调音。然而，几位评论者指出了耳挂和耳塞的贴合问题，还有一位报告了持续的咔嗒声。总体而言，对于低音爱好者和普通听众来说，这是一个物有所值的选择，但可能不适合追求中性或技术性声音的人。
优点
- 价格实惠，音质出色
- 水晶般清晰的音频清晰度
- 适合低音爱好者的出色重低音调音
- 使用海绵耳塞佩戴舒适
- 可拆卸线缆，方便更换
缺点
- 耳挂和耳塞的贴合问题
- 有用户报告持续的咔嗒声
- 部分产品的耳套松动
- 低音泄漏可能会打扰一些听众
- 不适合追求中性声音的人
Sound quality 8
Value for money 6
Fit and comfort 5
Bass performance 4
Build quality 3
Cable quality 2
Technics EAH-AZ100
88 满分 100 置信度中 28 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ100 耳机因其卓越的音质而广受赞誉，用户强调深沉的低音、清晰的高音和沉浸式音频。舒适度、电池续航和降噪功能也经常受到称赞，尽管一些用户指出价格较高且音量有限。提到了蓝牙 LE 断开和初始多设备配对等小问题，但总体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 深沉沉浸式低音
- 有效的降噪功能
- 舒适的佩戴感
- 出色的电池续航
缺点
- 价格较高
- 最大音量有限
- 蓝牙 LE 断开
- 多设备配对问题
- 塑料外壳
Sound quality 12
Bass performance 6
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 6
Battery life 5
Value for money 4
评分
Budget
Travel
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Fitness
规格
| CCA CRA PRO | Technics EAH-AZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | ear-hook | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | S, M, L | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | 0.05 kg | 0.05 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 23 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 107 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | CCA CRA PRO in Ear Monitors, IEMs for Gaming, Ultra-Thin DLC Diaphragm Dynamic Driver Wired Gaming Earbuds, Deep Bass Clear Sound Ear Buds IEM Headphones, in Ears for Singers (Silver, Without Mic) | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Dolby Atmos |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | Bluetooth |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 8 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 28 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 6★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| App | Android | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX4 |
优缺点
CCA CRA PRO
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
- Strong sound (65th percentile)
- Below average mic (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average anc (31st percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
价格
CCA CRA PRO
Technics EAH-AZ100
No current pricing available
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 22 of 40 specs.
