Technics EAH-AZ100-S

Technics EAH-AZ100-S

Technics
97 综合评分
vs
CCA AS16 PRO

CCA AS16 PRO

CCA
46 综合评分

买家怎么说

Technics EAH-AZ100-S

85 满分 100 置信度中 17 条评价

Technics EAH-AZ100 耳机因其卓越的音质、有效的降噪和令人印象深刻的通话清晰度而获得压倒性的积极反馈。用户称赞 LDAC 支持、舒适贴合和可定制应用程序,尽管有些人报告了贴合问题和外壳磁铁较弱。总体而言,它们被认为是发烧友和专业人士的顶级选择。

优点
  • LDAC 带来的卓越音质
  • 有效的降噪
  • AI 带来的令人印象深刻的通话清晰度
  • 长时间佩戴舒适贴合
  • 可定制的 EQ 和 ANC 设置
缺点
  • 部分用户贴合问题
  • 外壳磁铁较弱
  • 难以找到兼容的泡沫耳塞
  • 应用程序中没有电池充电限制设置
  • 价格较高
👍 Sound quality 14
👍 Noise cancellation 8
👍 Call quality 4
🤔 Comfort and fit 7
👍 Build quality 4
👍 Battery life 5

CCA AS16 PRO

85 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价

KZ AS16 耳机提供出色的音质,尤其适合游戏和音乐,具有清晰的中音、细致的高音和宽广的声场。它们体积较大,可能不适合小耳朵,但耳朵较大的用户觉得舒适且稳固。一些用户指出高音可能刺耳,线缆较短,但总体而言,它们在100美元以下提供了难以置信的性价比。

优点
  • 出色的音质
  • 清晰的中音和高音
  • 适合游戏的宽广声场
  • 低于100美元的绝佳性价比
  • 大耳朵佩戴舒适
缺点
  • 大尺寸可能不适合小耳朵
  • 高音可能刺耳
  • 线缆长度较短
  • 并非某些旧型号的升级
👍 Sound quality 7
🤔 Fit and comfort 6
👍 Value for money 4
👍 Gaming performance 3
👍 Build quality 2
👎 Cable length 2

评分

Budget
Technics
94
CCA
58
Travel
Technics
92
CCA
28
Calls
Technics
91
CCA
18
Music
Technics
89
CCA
46
Gaming
Technics
87
CCA
38
Commute
Technics
87
CCA
28
Fitness
Technics
78
CCA
28

规格

Technics EAH-AZ100-SCCA AS16 PRO
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless—
Ear Tips5 x Eartip Pairs—
Weight0.05 kg★0.07 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicbalanced armature
Driver Size10 mm★—
Drivers18★
Freq Min20 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max40 kHz40 kHz
Impedance16 Ω15 Ω
Hi-Res Audio✓✓
CodecsAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC—
SurroundDolby Atmos—
Noise Control
ANC✓★✗
ANC Typeadaptive—
Transparency✗—
Connectivity
Wireless✓★—
Bluetooth5.3★—
ProfilesAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP—
Multipoint✓★—
Wired ConnectorBluetooth—
Range10 m★—
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs★—
Charge Time2.5 hrs★—
Fast Charging15 min. for 90 min. playback—
ChargingUSB-C★—
Case Battery
Case Battery28 hrs★—
Case ChargingUSB-C★—
Wireless Charging✓★—
Microphone
Microphone✓★—
Mic Count6★—
NC Mic✓★—
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Touch Controls✓★—
AppAndroid & iOS—
Volume Limiting✗—
Gaming Mode✗✓★
Bone Conduction✗✗
Water ResistanceIPX4—

优缺点

Technics EAH-AZ100-S

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (90th percentile)90th %ile

CCA AS16 PRO

  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
  • Below average mic (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (29th percentile)
  • Below average anc (31st percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

价格

Technics EAH-AZ100-S

No current pricing available

CCA AS16 PRO

结论

★ 胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100-S

Scores 97 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 39 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100-S 更擅长:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

也值得考虑