Technics EAH-AZ100-N

Technics EAH-AZ100-N

Technics
100 综合评分
vs
CCA AS16 PRO

CCA AS16 PRO

CCA
46 综合评分

买家怎么说

Technics EAH-AZ100-N

92 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价

Technics EAH-AZ100 耳机因其出色的音质(尤其是使用 LDAC 和杜比全景声时)而获得压倒性的积极反馈。用户强调其基于 AI 的通话降噪功能出奇地有效,可以屏蔽尖叫的孩子或洗车等背景噪音。通过应用程序实现的舒适性和自定义功能也受到称赞,尽管有些人指出其主动降噪比之前的 AZ80 型号稍弱。

优点
  • 使用 LDAC 的出色音质
  • AI 通话降噪
  • 长时间佩戴舒适
  • 通过应用程序自定义均衡器
  • 有效的主动降噪和通透模式
缺点
  • 价格较高(300美元)
  • 主动降噪比 AZ80 稍弱
  • 触控需要适应
👍 Sound quality 8
👍 Call quality 3
🤔 Noise cancellation 5
👍 Comfort 4
👍 Battery life 2
🤔 Value for money 3

CCA AS16 PRO

85 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价

KZ AS16 耳机提供出色的音质,尤其适合游戏和音乐,具有清晰的中音、细致的高音和宽广的声场。它们体积较大,可能不适合小耳朵,但耳朵较大的用户觉得舒适且稳固。一些用户指出高音可能刺耳,线缆较短,但总体而言,它们在100美元以下提供了难以置信的性价比。

优点
  • 出色的音质
  • 清晰的中音和高音
  • 适合游戏的宽广声场
  • 低于100美元的绝佳性价比
  • 大耳朵佩戴舒适
缺点
  • 大尺寸可能不适合小耳朵
  • 高音可能刺耳
  • 线缆长度较短
  • 并非某些旧型号的升级
👍 Sound quality 7
🤔 Fit and comfort 6
👍 Value for money 4
👍 Gaming performance 3
👍 Build quality 2
👎 Cable length 2

评分

Travel
Technics
94
CCA
28
Budget
Technics
94
CCA
58
Calls
Technics
92
CCA
18
Music
Technics
90
CCA
46
Commute
Technics
89
CCA
28
Gaming
Technics
88
CCA
38
Fitness
Technics
78
CCA
28

规格

Technics EAH-AZ100-NCCA AS16 PRO
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless—
Ear TipsExtra large, Large, Medium, Small—
Weight0.05 kg★0.07 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicbalanced armature
Driver Size10 mm★—
Drivers18★
Freq Min20 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max40 kHz40 kHz
Impedance—15 Ω
Hi-Res Audio✓✓
CodecsAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC—
SurroundDolby Atmos—
Noise Control
ANC✓★✗
ANC Typeadaptive—
Transparency✓★—
Connectivity
Wireless✓★—
Bluetooth5.3★—
ProfilesAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP—
Multipoint✓★—
Wired ConnectorBluetooth—
Range10 m★—
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs★—
Charge Time2.5 hrs★—
Fast Charging15 min. for 90 min. playback—
ChargingUSB-C★—
Case Battery
Case Battery28 hrs★—
Case ChargingUSB-C★—
Wireless Charging✓★—
Microphone
Microphone✓★—
Mic Count6★—
NC Mic✓★—
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Touch Controls✓★—
AppAndroid & iOS—
Volume Limiting✗—
Gaming Mode✗✓★
Bone Conduction✗✗
Water ResistanceIPX4—

优缺点

Technics EAH-AZ100-N

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile

CCA AS16 PRO

  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
  • Below average mic (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (29th percentile)
  • Below average anc (31st percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

价格

Technics EAH-AZ100-N

No current pricing available

CCA AS16 PRO

结论

★ 胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100-N

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 18 of 39 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100-N 更擅长:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

也值得考虑