Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core AMD Socket SP5
Dell
81 综合评分
vs
Intel Core i7 9700K 8-core LGA1151
Intel
67 综合评分
买家怎么说
Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core AMD Socket SP5
暂无用户反馈
Intel Core i7 9700K 8-core LGA1151
82 满分 100 置信度高 30 条评价
英特尔酷睿i7-9700K因其出色的性能而广受赞誉，尤其是在游戏方面，许多用户报告称在搭配良好散热器时帧率高且温度低。少数用户遇到了故障芯片或初始蓝屏，但更换后问题得到解决。不附带散热器和导热膏是常见的缺点，一些用户建议如果预算有限，可以等待下一代AMD。
优点
- 出色的游戏性能
- 搭配好散热器温度低
- 性价比高
- 易于超频
- 更换后可靠
缺点
- 不附带散热器
- 不附带导热膏
- 可能有故障芯片
- 需要单独购买散热器
- 更换需等待10天
Performance 6
Temperature 4
Value for money 3
Reliability 3
Cooling solution 4
Customer service 3
评分
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
Budget
Gaming
Efficiency
规格
| Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 | Intel Core i7 9700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | Intel |
| Series | Xeon | Core i7 |
| Model | 9455 | 9700K |
| Codename | Turin | Coffee Lake |
| Class | server | desktop |
| Process | 4★ | 14 |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 32★ | 8 |
| P-cores | 48★ | — |
| Threads | 64★ | 8 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 48★ | 2 |
| L3 Cache | ||
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| Max Memory | ||
| ECC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462) | LGA 1151 |
| PCIe | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 64★ | 16 |
| TDP | 200 | 95★ |
| Max Turbo Power | 350★ | — |
| Unlocked | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | No | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
优缺点
Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core AMD Socket SP5
- Strong multi thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong ai (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong efficiency (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong feature (91st percentile)91st %ile
Intel Core i7 9700K 8-core LGA1151
- Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong feature (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong single thread (79th percentile)
- Strong ai (72nd percentile)
价格
Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core AMD Socket SP5
No current pricing available
Intel Core i7 9700K 8-core LGA1151
结论
胜出: Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2
Scores 81 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 27 specs.
