Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851
Intel
98 综合评分
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 6-core AMD Socket AM4
AMD
62 综合评分
买家怎么说
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851
88 满分 100 置信度高 32 条评价
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 因其原始性能而广受赞誉，尤其是在4K游戏和繁重多任务处理方面，用户注意到与旧CPU相比有显著提升。在适当散热下保持凉爽，其效率和DDR5及PCIe 5.0支持被强调为重大优势。一些人提到在1080p/1440p游戏中可能不如AMD，但在4K和生产力方面表现出色。少数人指出缺少散热器和托盘包装是次要缺点，但整体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 出色的4K游戏性能
- 强大的多任务处理和生产效率
- 适当散热下保持凉爽
- 支持DDR5和PCIe 5.0
- 能效高（125W TDP）
缺点
- 不附带散热器
- 托盘包装（无零售盒）
- 在1080p/1440p游戏中可能落后于AMD
- 需要BIOS调整以获得最佳性能
- 价格较高
Gaming performance 8
Multitasking productivity 6
Thermal management 5
Power efficiency 4
Memory support 4
Value for money 3
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 6-core AMD Socket AM4
72 满分 100 置信度中 10 条评价
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 因其强大的多核性能和性价比而备受赞誉，尤其是在视频编辑方面，但用户指出它没有附带散热器和集成显卡。超频潜力不错，但发热量大，需要良好的 AM4 散热器。总体而言，它是预算构建的可靠选择，尽管非 X 版本的 1600 对大多数人来说更具价值。
优点
- 强大的多核性能
- 性价比高
- 超频潜力好
- 编辑性能优于 i7-6700
缺点
- 不附带散热器
- 无集成显卡
- 发热量大
- 需要良好的 AM4 散热器
Performance 4
Value for money 3
Cooling requirements 4
Overclocking 3
Included accessories 3
Integrated graphics 2
评分
Ai Llm
Budget
Productivity
Gaming
Efficiency
Server
规格
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | AMD |
| Series | Core Ultra 9 | Ryzen 5 |
| Model | 285K | 1600X |
| Codename | Arrow Lake-S | Summit Ridge |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | 3★ | 14 |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 24★ | 6 |
| P-cores | 8★ | 6 |
| E-cores | 16★ | — |
| Threads | 24★ | 12 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 40★ | 3 |
| L3 Cache | 36★ | 16 |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR5★ | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max Memory | 无数据 | |
| ECC | ✓ | ✓ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA 1851 | AM4 |
| PCIe | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 24★ | 16 |
| TDP | 125 | 95★ |
| Max Turbo Power | 250★ | — |
| Unlocked | ✓ | ✓ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Intel Graphics | — |
| NPU TOPS | 13★ | — |
优缺点
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851
- Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong single thread (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong efficiency (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 6-core AMD Socket AM4
- Strong social proof (78th percentile)
- Strong platform (75th percentile)
- Strong multi thread (67th percentile)
- Strong efficiency (65th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
价格
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA18510.001每美元得分
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 6-core AMD Socket AM40.002每美元得分
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 6-core AMD Socket AM4 性价比高 2.0 倍
结论
胜出: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Scores 98 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 17 of 29 specs.