Intel E5-2699v4
Intel
31 综合评分
vs
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851
Intel
98 综合评分
买家怎么说
Intel E5-2699v4
暂无用户反馈
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851
88 满分 100 置信度高 32 条评价
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 因其原始性能而广受赞誉，尤其是在4K游戏和繁重多任务处理方面，用户注意到与旧CPU相比有显著提升。在适当散热下保持凉爽，其效率和DDR5及PCIe 5.0支持被强调为重大优势。一些人提到在1080p/1440p游戏中可能不如AMD，但在4K和生产力方面表现出色。少数人指出缺少散热器和托盘包装是次要缺点，但整体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 出色的4K游戏性能
- 强大的多任务处理和生产效率
- 适当散热下保持凉爽
- 支持DDR5和PCIe 5.0
- 能效高（125W TDP）
缺点
- 不附带散热器
- 托盘包装（无零售盒）
- 在1080p/1440p游戏中可能落后于AMD
- 需要BIOS调整以获得最佳性能
- 价格较高
Gaming performance 8
Multitasking productivity 6
Thermal management 5
Power efficiency 4
Memory support 4
Value for money 3
评分
Ai Llm
Budget
Productivity
Gaming
Efficiency
Server
规格
| Intel E5-2699v4 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | Intel |
| Series | Xeon | Core Ultra 9 |
| Model | E5-2696v4 | 285K |
| Codename | — | Arrow Lake-S |
| Class | server | desktop |
| Process | — | 3★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 22 | 24★ |
| P-cores | — | 8★ |
| E-cores | — | 16★ |
| Threads | 12 | 24★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 4 | 40★ |
| L3 Cache | 39★ | 36 |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR5★ |
| Max Speed | 无数据 | |
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| Max Memory | 无数据 | |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA2011-3 | LGA 1851 |
| PCIe | — | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24★ |
| TDP | — | 125★ |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 250★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✓★ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | Intel Graphics |
| NPU TOPS | — | 13★ |
优缺点
Intel E5-2699v4
- Below average single thread (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average efficiency (30th percentile)
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851
- Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong single thread (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong efficiency (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
价格
结论
胜出: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Scores 98 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 20 of 29 specs.
