AMD Ryzen 7 8700F 8-core AM5
AMD
75 综合评分
vs
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851
Intel
98 综合评分
买家怎么说
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F 8-core AM5
55 满分 100 置信度中 10 条评价
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F 收到褒贬不一的反馈。一些用户称赞其在日常任务和搭配独立显卡的经济型配置中的性能，而另一些用户则报告了严重问题，例如首次启动时出现红灯指示 CPU 损坏，以及驱动程序更新问题。问答部分澄清了它需要 AM5 主板和 DDR5 内存，并附带预涂导热膏的散热器。
优点
- 适合日常任务
- 搭配独立显卡经济实惠
- 附带散热器
- 预涂导热膏
- 具有NPU
缺点
- 首次启动时红灯
- 驱动程序更新问题
- 需要AM5主板
- 需要DDR5内存
- 无集成显卡
Performance 3
Reliability 2
Driver issues 2
Compatibility 2
Value for money 2
Cooler included 2
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851
88 满分 100 置信度高 32 条评价
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 因其原始性能而广受赞誉，尤其是在4K游戏和繁重多任务处理方面，用户注意到与旧CPU相比有显著提升。在适当散热下保持凉爽，其效率和DDR5及PCIe 5.0支持被强调为重大优势。一些人提到在1080p/1440p游戏中可能不如AMD，但在4K和生产力方面表现出色。少数人指出缺少散热器和托盘包装是次要缺点，但整体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 出色的4K游戏性能
- 强大的多任务处理和生产效率
- 适当散热下保持凉爽
- 支持DDR5和PCIe 5.0
- 能效高（125W TDP）
缺点
- 不附带散热器
- 托盘包装（无零售盒）
- 在1080p/1440p游戏中可能落后于AMD
- 需要BIOS调整以获得最佳性能
- 价格较高
Gaming performance 8
Multitasking productivity 6
Thermal management 5
Power efficiency 4
Memory support 4
Value for money 3
评分
Ai Llm
Budget
Productivity
Gaming
Efficiency
Server
规格
| AMD Ryzen 7 8700F | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | Intel |
| Series | Ryzen 7 | Core Ultra 9 |
| Model | 8700F | 285K |
| Codename | Phoenix | Arrow Lake-S |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | 4 | 3★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 8 | 24★ |
| P-cores | 8 | 8 |
| E-cores | — | 16★ |
| Threads | 16 | 24★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 8 | 40★ |
| L3 Cache | 16 | 36★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max Memory | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM5 | LGA 1851 |
| PCIe | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24★ |
| TDP | 65★ | 125 |
| Max Turbo Power | 65★ | 250 |
| Unlocked | ✓ | ✓ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon graphics | Intel Graphics |
| NPU TOPS | 16★ | 13 |
优缺点
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F 8-core AM5
- Strong feature (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong efficiency (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong single thread (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong multi thread (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (5th percentile)5th %ile
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851
- Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong single thread (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong efficiency (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
价格
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F 8-core AM50.002每美元得分
vs
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA18510.001每美元得分
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F 8-core AM5 性价比高 2.0 倍
结论
胜出: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Scores 98 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 29 specs.