Thermal Grizzly 000 AM5
Thermal Grizzly
13 综合评分
vs
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA 1151
Intel
33 综合评分
买家怎么说
Thermal Grizzly 000 AM5
暂无用户反馈
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA 1151
50 满分 100 置信度低 6 条评价
该产品收到褒贬不一的反馈。一些用户称赞它简单、有效且可靠，适合基础配置，而另一些用户则报告说它到达时没有风扇或根本无法工作。包装和质量控制问题被提及，但对于收到功能正常产品的用户来说，它运行良好。
优点
- 简单有效
- 基础配置可靠
- 性价比高
- 与CPU配合良好
缺点
- 不含风扇
- 包装问题
- 部分产品到货有缺陷
- 质量控制问题
Functionality 6
Packaging 2
Value for money 2
Included accessories 1
Reliability 3
Ease of use 2
评分
Budget
Efficiency
Gaming
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
规格
| Thermal Grizzly 000 | Intel Celeron G3900 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | Intel |
| Series | — | Celeron |
| Model | 000 | G3900 |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 2★ |
| Threads | — | 2★ |
| Base Clock | 无数据 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 0.5★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | 无数据 | |
| PassMark Single | 无数据 | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR4★ |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM5 | LGA 1151 |
| TDP | — | 51★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | Intel HD Graphics 510 |
优缺点
Thermal Grizzly 000 AM5
- Strong affordability (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average ai (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA 1151
- Strong affordability (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (69th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average ai (24th percentile)
- Below average multi thread (27th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (35th percentile)
价格
Thermal Grizzly 000 AM50.002每美元得分
vs
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA 11510.003每美元得分
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA 1151 性价比高 1.5 倍
结论
胜出: Intel Celeron G3900
Scores 33 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 16 specs.
