AMD Ryzen 5 8400F 6-core AM5
AMD
82 综合评分
vs
HP Celeron N4500 2-core Intel BGA 1338
HP
17 综合评分
买家怎么说
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F 6-core AM5
72 满分 100 置信度中 18 条评价
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F 因其性能和性价比而普遍受到好评，许多用户称赞其性价比和易于安装。然而，也有明显的投诉，包括配送延迟、卖家欺诈体验以及 OEM 版本不附带散热器。有人建议如果价格超过 100 美元，考虑购买 Ryzen 7600。
优点
- 出色的性价比
- 易于安装
- 整体性能良好
- 附带 Wraith Stealth 散热器（零售版）
- 低 TDP（65W）
缺点
- 配送缓慢
- 卖家欺诈体验
- OEM 版本无散热器
- 价格可能过高
- 可能存在主板问题
Value for money 5
Performance 4
Shipping delays 1
Seller reliability 1
Cooler included 3
Ease of setup 2
HP Celeron N4500 2-core Intel BGA 1338
暂无用户反馈
评分
Efficiency
Budget
Productivity
Gaming
Ai Llm
Server
规格
| AMD Ryzen 5 8400F | HP Celeron N4500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | Intel |
| Series | Ryzen 5 | Celeron |
| Model | 8400F | N4500 |
| Codename | Phoenix | Jasper Lake |
| Class | desktop | laptop |
| Process | 4★ | 10 |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 6★ | 2 |
| P-cores | 6★ | 2 |
| Threads | 12★ | 2 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 6★ | 3 |
| L3 Cache | 16★ | 4 |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | 无数据 | |
| PassMark Single | 无数据 | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR5★ | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 2★ | — |
| Max Memory | 无数据 | |
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM5 | Intel BGA 1338 |
| PCIe | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 20★ | 8 |
| TDP | 65 | 6★ |
| Max Turbo Power | 65 | 20★ |
| Unlocked | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon graphics | Intel UHD Graphics |
优缺点
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F 6-core AM5
- Strong efficiency (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong single thread (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong platform (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
HP Celeron N4500 2-core Intel BGA 1338
- Below average social proof (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average multi thread (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average ai (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average single thread (31st percentile)
价格
结论
胜出: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
Scores 82 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 16 of 27 specs.
