SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
89 Общая оценка
vs
Kingston 960GB SSD SATA III

Kingston 960GB SSD SATA III

Kingston
45 Общая оценка

Оценки

Console
SanDisk
85
Kingston
18
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Kingston
38
Gaming
SanDisk
84
Kingston
35
Budget
SanDisk
57
Kingston
81
Laptop
SanDisk
65
Kingston
45
Portable
SanDisk
23
Kingston
12

Характеристики

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Kingston 960GB SSD
Drive
Capacity
8,000
960
Form FactorM.2 22802.5"
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4SATA III
ProtocolNVMeSATA
PCIe Generation5★—
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
500
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
450
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
Нет данных
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
Нет данных
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✗
ControllernCache 4.0Marvell 88SS1074
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
300
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
1,000,000
Warranty (years)5★—
Features
Heatsink✓★✗
Hardware Encryption✓★✗

Плюсы и минусы

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

Kingston 960GB SSD SATA III

  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Below average speed (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)

Вердикт

★ Победитель: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 89 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Лучше в:

GamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Kingston 960GB SSD Лучше в:

Budget