SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

SanDisk
90 Pontuação geral
vs
Samsung PM9C1a

Samsung PM9C1a

Samsung
42 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Console
SanDisk
86
Samsung
37
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Samsung
41
Gaming
SanDisk
85
Samsung
37
Budget
SanDisk
72
Samsung
35
Laptop
SanDisk
66
Samsung
44
Portable
SanDisk
24
Samsung
11

Especificações

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Samsung PM9C1a
Drive
Capacity
8,000
256
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★4
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
5,600
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
6,000
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
Sem dados
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
Sem dados
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗—
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
Sem dados
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
Sem dados
Warranty (years)5★—
Features
Heatsink✓★—
Hardware Encryption✓★—

Prós e Contras

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile

Samsung PM9C1a

  • Strong speed (77th percentile)
  • Below average endurance (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average capacity (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average social proof (26th percentile)

Veredito

★ Vencedor: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 90 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Melhor em:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation