Tamron A17-200 28-200mm

Tamron A17-200 28-200mm

Tamron
45 Pontuação geral
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic
88 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Macro
Tamron
18
Panasonic
96
Budget
Tamron
51
Panasonic
92
Landscape
Tamron
42
Panasonic
90
Travel
Tamron
57
Panasonic
90
Video Cinema
Tamron
40
Panasonic
86
Professional
Tamron
40
Panasonic
86
Portrait
Tamron
57
Panasonic
84
Street
Tamron
56
Panasonic
83
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
43
Panasonic
82

Especificações

Tamron A17-200 28-200mmPanasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min28 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm200 mm
Elements17
Groups13
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements4
CoatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.8f/4
Min Aperture3.8-5.64-7.1
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountAdaptallL-Mount
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.08 kg0.41 kg
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyAutofocus
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm
Max Magnification0.5x

Prós e Contras

Tamron A17-200 28-200mm

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Veredito

Vencedor: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm Melhor em:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports